With the content displayed in the left-hand column of the table below being a fairly straight forward, self-explanatory compilation of thoughts structured around rules that govern the use and application of the English language.
I won't go into a detailed explaination of what the purpose of putting such gibberish and clutter in the right-hand column was meant to signify, for I believe the content on the left side can sufficiently aid a human in figuring out the purpose of such a blatant display of anything but "proper usage" of the English language.
Now if only an equation was attempting to determine what language I was using in the right-hand column...
Would the equation fail or succeed in what I would consider to be a correct identification of the "language used"?
Just a little something to munch and crunch on before reading the rest of this particular demonstrative rambling about readin' and writin' in English and one grading system in particular.
Left Column | Right Column |
I was once asked by a young teen whether or not I believed a book could be written for a person with dyslexia. I really struggled with my response, for I have never been one to fast-stamp an ability to view text differently than others, but I suggested it was possible and then it was off into an animated debate on how production of such a document could be made possible, rather than identifying and focusing on why such an effort would be nothing less than impossible.
“Expressive language disorder” is a label frequently used to externally define circumstances in which language barriers are represented. Debatable as this summary may represent, it is through the act of breaking down such a suggestion into small enough pieces to where my own discomfort continues to find fertile intellectual soil. First, this particular expression comes directly from a book known as “The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders” produced by the American Psychiatric Association. This book has gone through numerous re-printings, updates and republications for quite a few decades and there are even thousands of books composed over the years that were undeniably born from this particular compilation. The numeric line-item designation in the book for dyslexia is 315.02 and is as follows: “Dyslexia is a language-based disability caused by a brain impairment when interpreting images into meaningful language. Children with dyslexia, who usually have normal eyesight and average or above average intelligence, have difficulty interpreting spoken language and writing. The common symptoms of dyslexia include the inability to recognize words and letters on a printed page, a reading ability level below the expected level for the child’s age, difficulty processing and understanding what is heard, and trouble understanding written words. Although dyslexia cannot be cured, it is treated with multi-sensory teaching methods.” With this kind of abstract for a “disease” of communications as a base line for all other medicinal analysis, such verbiage can drive a person temporarily nuts during contemplation, and who knows. Maybe someday someone could formulate grounds to sue in a court of law, but in the meantime, it is not the book itself that holds the gravest of rationale and justification risks. Without having any actual statistics to operate from, it is certainly a worthy question for contemplation as to just how many dyslexia determinations have been made compared to perhaps a reality that someone is far better off learning one of the many other languages in existence, let alone that option and opportunity to create a brand new one. Perhaps a common ground reference to this particular framework would be towards a pair of scissors being designed for use by the right hand and then adding perhaps a centuries-long absence of a pair of scissors designed for use by the left hand. In school, I recall the challenges put forth by those who showed left-handed dominance, with teachers typically having no alternative other than demanding of the individual to adapt and learn how to use the right-handed pair and then good luck to the student who drew the tempermental teachers that would become agitated and angry when a lefty failed to cut in a “proper fashion” With marketplace failure available for quick explanation and perhaps even fault and blame for such a long absence, just because someone is born in America does not automatically create a guaranteed and expected connection to the English language and all other signals are to immediately be treated as a “disease” rather than any other option. What if they are simply adept at speaking another existing language? Some are read left to right, not all are based on the Latin alphabet, etc. So how does a failure to meaningfully interpret the English language in its traditionally accepted form and formation represent nothing less than a disease status being assigned as a mandatory starting point for others to follow…more often than not with profiting purposes instilled in the efforts. Leaving excess disease profiteering aside, it is this elongated burst of consumer demands for communications tools that fulfill descriptive adjectives being used to describe what it means to have a “safe” communications experience using technology that further reduces the weight and measure of the fear factors perpetually instilled into the direction of the unknown and unpredictable. Also, the proliferation of language after language after language as a means to an end vision of consistently delivering virtually undecipherable communications as a groundwork in which all other languages can then chat amongst one another is a marketable skill holding significant weight and measure. And yet, how not so funny that the formal and codified diseasing of such abilities allows for a justified automatic lowering of the economic value of such a talent, bolstered by a social outcast context once a disease has been externally established as being existent no matter what behaviors are exhibited. In the state I live in here in the United States, it is a crime to perpetuate the image of ailment when no such ailment exists, no matter how reductive or non-reductive the ailment is anchored in. Someone can hold physical ailments that hold mild degrees of reduction, while other physical ailments define themselves as to the most likely to be present and restrictive for the duration of one’s lifetime experiences. And although it’s easy and simple to discuss such presence as being real and true because it is visible to the eye, such as with the absence of a limb or some other obvious physical alteration, mind-based ailments have ability to hold just as much of a sense of reality as does a law dictating a one-armed piano player can now be economically assaulted in a legal manner due to the absence of an arm. The premise is that if a piano player has only one arm, such a disability represents a clear inability to fulfill a contract of any kind relating to a performance on the piano and therefore the contractor is not obligated to pay on the contract, thereby receiving a free performance despite a written promise of payment after the contract was fulfilled.
With the legal premise of purchasing on an “as-is basis,” it is difficult to not associate what ails our current government, ranging from the contemplation of why such a law was needed in the first place, let alone the clear violation of not just civil rights, but basic contract law. The purchaser of the performance either knows at the time of signing the piano player has but one arm or the incident happens prior to the performance. Either way, there are hard drives upon hard drives of examples in which if there is an “act of God” or some other unavoidable circumstance, the contract is either still in complete force or it is to be severed and perhaps with penalties.
But ultimately, there has been case law after case law set forth to address such an issue. This appearance of a need to codify such narrow and specific permission in the law books as something to view as an ideal objective to aspire towards when confronted with such a circumstance is just as astonishing as a law fining an artist if they somehow screw up signing the national anthem. These types of real people signatures being affixed to promotion of the school of thought that these kinds of seemingly desperate measures are of absolute necessity during these depressing and disturbing financial times and circumstances… Abstract as this particular scenario may initially seem when talking about dyslexia as a disease compared to any other determination, it is within the idea of mankind being so skilled and well-versed at seeking and identifying mind-based ailments, books such as the DSM literally drive the multi-trillion dollar efforts to add, subtract, multiply and divide every single click and clack that can possibly be tracked for further exploration and study, while also being a significant force in a court room for further distinction and determination as to whether or not a line-item assignment from the DSM actually applies or not to various circumstance, as per the evidence may or may not suggest. With even software designed to capture and interpret our responses to symbols labeled with clear intent on mind health evaluation, the proliferation of such measurements for measures of profit, let alone suggestive of such clear and decisive prophecy that only an either/or setting can be implemented lest the interpretation become to clouded with other judgments over the circumstances. Being able to read and write with the text positioned in a backwards formation seems like a highly complex process, but that is only because I have been trained to read and write while applying the basic standards of the English language compared to any other linguistical pattern… Such as what is presented here. Is the text being presented in a backwards format a clear indicator of a “universal expressive language disorder” in terms of an incurable illness… Or is it just a failure to step away from an American-based standard of expectation when it comes to mankind and the reality that many forms of expression are still yet to be discovered. After all, the existence of a God particle still hasn’t made it into universal vernacular, but the expression still exists. God particle. What a phrase! Expressive language disorder. What a sentence! Figuring out how to transcribe this composition into its backwards format. What a headache! |
I saw ecno deksa yb a gnuoy neet rehtehw ro ton I deveileb a koob dluoc eb nettirw rof a nosrep htiw aixelsyd. I yllaer delggurts htiw ym esnopser, rof I evah reven neeb eno ot pmats-tsaf na ytiliba ot weiv txet yltnereffid naht srehto, tub I detseggus ti saw elbissop dna neht ti saw ffo otni na detamina etabed no woh noitcudorp fo hcus a tnemucod dluoc eb edam elbissop, rehtar naht gniyfitnedi dna gnisucof no yhw hcus na troffe dluow eb gnihton ssel naht elbissopmi. evisserpxE egaugnal redrosid si a lebal yltneuqerf desu ot yllanretxe enifed secnatsmucric ni hcihw egaugnal sreirrab era detneserper. elbatabeD sa siht yrammus yam tneserper, ti si hguorht eht tca fo gnikaerb nwod hcus a noitseggus otni llams hguone seceip ot erehw ym nwo trofmocsid seunitnoc ot dnif elitref lautcelletni lios. ,tsriF siht ralucitrap noisserpxe semoc yltcerid morf a koob nwonk sa ehT" citsongaiD dna lacitsitatS launaM fo latneM "sredrosiD decudorp yb eht naciremA cirtaihcysP .noitaicossA sihT koob sah enog hguorht suoremun ,sgnitnirp-er setadpu dna snoitacilbuper rof etiuq a wef sedaced dna ereht era neve sdnasuoht fo skoob desopmoc revo eht sraey taht erew ylbainednu nrob morf siht ralucitrap .noitalipmoc ehT ciremun meti-enil noitangised ni eht koob rof aixelsyd si 20.513 dna si sa :swollof aixelsyD" si a desab-egaugnal ytilibasid desuac yb a niarb tnemriapmi nehw gniterpretni segami otni lufgninaem .egaugnal nerdlihC htiw ,aixelsyd ohw yllausu evah lamron thgiseye dna egareva ro evoba egareva ,ecnegilletni evah ytluciffid gniterpretni nekops egaugnal dna .gnitirw ehT nommoc smotpmys fo aixelsyd edulcni eht ytilibani ot ezingocer sdrow dna srettel no a detnirp ,egap a gnidaer ytiliba level woleb eht detcepxe level rof eht s'dlihc ,ega ytluciffid gnissecorp dna gnidnatsrednu tahw si ,draeh dna elbuort gnidnatsrednu nettirw .sdrow hguohtlA aixelsyd tonnac eb ,deruc ti si detaert htiw yrosnes-itlum gnihcaet ".sdohtem htiW siht dnik fo tcartsba rof a "esaesid" fo snoitacinummoc sa a esab enil rof lla rehto lanicidem ,sisylana hcus egaibrev nac evird a nosrep yliraropmet stun gnirud ,noitalpmetnoc dna ohw .swonk ebyaM yademos enoemos dluoc etalumrof sdnuorg ot eus ni a truoc fo ,wal tub ni eht ,emitnaem ti si ton eht koob flesti taht sdloh eht tsevarg fo elanoitar dna noitacifitsuj .sksir .eno wen dnarb a etaerc ot ytinutroppo dna noitpo taht enola tel ,ecnetsixe ni segaugnal rehto ynam eht fo eno gninrael ffo retteb raf si enoemos taht ytilaer a spahrep ot derapmoc edam neeb evah snoitanimreted aixelsyd ynam woh tsuj ot sa noitalpmetnoc rof noitseuq yhtrow a ylniatrec si ti ,morf etarepo ot scitsitats lautca yna gnivah tuohtiW spahreP a nommoc dnuorg ecnerefer ot siht ralucitrap krowemarf dluow eb sdrawot a riap fo srossics gnieb dengised rof esu yb eht thgir dnah dna neht gnidda spahrep a gnol-seirutnec ecnesba fo a riap fo srossics dengised rof esu yb eht tfel .dnah nI ,loohcs I llacer eht segnellahc tup htrof yb esoht ohw dewohs dednah-tfel ,ecnanimod htiw srehcaet yllacipyt gnivah on evitanretla rehto naht gnidnamed fo eht laudividni ot tpada dna nrael woh ot esu eht dednah-thgir riap dna neht doog kcul ot eht tneduts ohw werd eht latnemrepmet srehcaet taht dluow emoceb detatiga dna yrgna nehw a ytfel deliaf ot tuc ni a reporp" "noihsaf htiW ecalptekram eruliaf elbaliava rof kciuq noitanalpxe dna spahrep neve tluaf dna emalb rof hcus a gnol ,ecnesba tsuj esuaceb enoemos si nrob ni aciremA seod ton yllacitamotua etaerc a deetnaraug dna detcepxe noitcennoc ot eht hsilgnE egaugnal dna lla rehto slangis era ot yletaidemmi eb detaert sa a "esaesid" rehtar naht yna rehto .noitpo tahW fi yeht era ylpmis tpeda ta gnikaeps rehtona gnitsixe ?egaugnal emoS era daer tfel ot ,thgir ton lla era desab no eht nitaL ,tebahpla .cte oS woh seod a eruliaf ot yllufgninaem terpretni eht hsilgnE egaugnal ni sti yllanoitidart detpecca mrof dna noitamrof tneserper gnihton ssel naht a esaesid sutats gnieb dengissa sa a yrotadnam gnitrats tniop rof srehto ot erom…wollof netfo naht ton htiw gnitiforp sesoprup dellitsni ni eht .stroffe gnivaeL ssecxe esaesid gnireetiforp ,edisa ti si siht detagnole tsrub fo remusnoc sdnamed rof snoitacinummoc sloot taht llifluf evitpircsed sevitcejda gnieb desu ot ebircsed tahw ti snaem ot evah a "efas" snoitacinummoc ecneirepxe gnisu ygolonhcet taht rehtruf secuder eht thgiew dna erusaem fo eht raef srotcaf yllauteprep dellitsni otni eht noitcerid fo eht nwonknu dna .elbatciderpnu ,oslA eht noitarefilorp fo egaugnal retfa egaugnal retfa egaugnal sa a snaem ot na dne noisiv fo yltnetsisnoc gnireviled yllautriv elbarehpicednu snoitacinummoc sa a krowdnuorg ni hcihw lla rehto segaugnal nac neht tahc tsgnoma eno rehtona si a elbatekram lliks gnidloh tnacifingis thgiew dna .erusaem dnA ,tey woh ton os ynnuf taht eht lamrof dna deifidoc gnisaesid fo hcus seitiliba swolla rof a deifitsuj citamotua gnirewol fo eht cimonoce eulav fo hcus a ,tnelat deretslob yb a laicos tsactuo txetnoc ecno a esaesid sah neeb yllanretxe dehsilbatse sa gnieb tnetsixe on rettam tahw sroivaheb era .detibihxe nI eht etats I evil ni ereh ni eht detinU ,setatS ti si a emirc ot etauteprep eht egami fo tnemlia nehw on hcus tnemlia ,stsixe on rettam woh evitcuder ro evitcuder-non eht tnemlia si derohcna .ni enoemoS nac dloh lacisyhp stnemlia taht dloh dlim seerged fo ,noitcuder elihw rehto lacisyhp stnemlia enifed sevlesmeht sa ot eht tsom ylekil ot eb tneserp dna evitcirtser rof eht noitarud fo s'eno emitefil .secneirepxe dnA hguohtla s'ti ysae dna elpmis ot ssucsid hcus ecneserp sa gnieb laer dna eurt esuaceb ti si elbisiv ot eht ,eye hcus sa htiw eht ecnesba fo a bmil ro emos rehto suoivbo lacisyhp ,noitaretla desab-dnim stnemlia evah ytiliba ot dloh tsuj sa hcum fo a esnes fo ytilaer sa seod a wal gnitatcid a demra-eno onaip reyalp nac won eb yllacimonoce detluassa ni a lagel rennam eud ot eht ecnesba fo na .mra ehT esimerp si taht fi a onaip reyalp sah ylno eno ,mra hcus a ytilibasid stneserper a raelc ytilibani ot llifluf a tcartnoc fo yna dnik gnitaler ot a ecnamrofrep no eht onaip dna erofereht eht rotcartnoc si ton detagilbo ot yap no eht ,tcartnoc ybereht gniviecer a eerf ecnamrofrep etipsed a nettirw esimorp fo tnemyap retfa eht tcartnoc saw .dellifluf htiW eht lagel esimerp fo gnisahcrup no na si-sa" ",sisab ti si tluciffid ot ton etaicossa tahw slia ruo tnerruc ,tnemnrevog gnignar morf eht noitalpmetnoc fo yhw hcus a wal saw dedeen ni eht tsrif ,ecalp tel enola eht raelc noitaloiv fo ton tsuj livic ,sthgir tub cisab tcartnoc .wal ehT resahcrup fo eht ecnamrofrep rehtie swonk ta eht emit fo gningis eht onaip reyalp sah tub eno mra ro eht tnedicni sneppah roirp ot eht .ecnamrofrep rehtiE ,yaw ereht era drah sevird nopu drah sevird fo selpmaxe ni hcihw fi ereht si na tca" fo "doG ro emos rehto elbadiovanu ,ecnatsmucric eht tcartnoc si rehtie llits ni etelpmoc ecrof ro ti si ot eb dereves dna spahrep htiw .seitlanep tuB ,yletamitlu ereht sah neeb esac wal retfa esac wal tes htrof ot sserdda hcus na .eussi sihT ecnaraeppa fo a deen ot yfidoc hcus worran dna cificeps noissimrep ni eht wal skoob sa gnihtemos ot weiv sa na laedi evitcejbo ot eripsa sdrawot nehw detnorfnoc htiw hcus a ecnatsmucric si tsuj sa gnihsinotsa sa a wal gninif na tsitra fi yeht wohemos wercs pu gningis eht lanoitan .mehtna esehT sepyt fo laer elpoep serutangis gnieb dexiffa ot noitomorp fo eht loohcs fo thguoht taht eseht sdnik fo ylgnimees etarepsed serusaem era fo etulosba ytissecen gnirud eseht gnisserped dna gnibrutsid laicnanif semit dna …secnatsmucric tcartsbA sa siht ralucitrap oiranecs yam yllaitini mees nehw gniklat tuoba aixelsyd sa a esaesid derapmoc ot yna rehto ,noitanimreted ti si nihtiw eht aedi fo dniknam gnieb os delliks dna desrev-llew ta gnikees dna gniyfitnedi desab-dnim ,stnemlia skoob hcus sa eht MSD yllaretil evird eht noillirt-itlum rallod stroffe ot ,dda ,tcartbus ylpitlum dna edivid yreve elgnis kcilc dna kcalc taht nac ylbissop eb dekcart rof rehtruf noitarolpxe dna ,yduts elihw osla gnieb a tnacifingis ecrof ni a truoc moor rof rehtruf noitcnitsid dna noitanimreted sa ot rehtehw ro ton a meti-enil tnemngissa morf eht MSD yllautca seilppa ro ton ot suoirav ,ecnatsmucric sa rep eht ecnedive yam ro yam ton .tseggus htiW neve erawtfos dengised ot erutpac dna terpretni ruo sesnopser ot slobmys delebal htiw raelc tnetni no dnim htlaeh ,noitaulave eht noitarefilorp fo hcus stnemerusaem rof serusaem fo ,tiforp tel enola evitseggus fo hcus raelc dna evisiced ycehporp taht ylno na ro/rehtie gnittes nac eb detnemelpmi tsel eht noitaterpretni emoceb ot deduolc htiw rehto stnemgduj revo eht .secnatsmucric gnieB elba ot daer dna etirw htiw eht txet denoitisop ni a sdrawkcab noitamrof smees ekil a ylhgih xelpmoc ,ssecorp tub taht si ylno esuaceb I evah neeb deniart ot daer dna etirw elihw gniylppa eht cisab sdradnats fo eht hsilgnE egaugnal derapmoc ot yna rehto lacitsiugnil …nrettap hcuS sa tahw si detneserp .ereh sI eht txet gnieb detneserp ni a sdrawkcab tamrof a raelc rotacidni fo a lasrevinu" evisserpxe egaugnal "redrosid ni smret fo na elbarucni …ssenlli rO si ti tsuj a eruliaf ot pets yawa morf na desab-nacirema dradnats fo noitatcepxe nehw ti semoc ot dniknam dna eht ytilaer that ynam smrof fo noisserpxe era lilts tey ot eb .derevocsid retfA lla, eht ecnetsixe fo a doG elcitrap llits t’nsah edam ti otni lasrevinu ralucanrev, tub eht noisserpxe llits .stsixe doG elcitrap. tahW a !esarhp evisserpxE egaugnal .redrosid tahW a !ecnetnes gnirugiF tuo who ot cbircsnart siht noitisopmoc otni sti sdrawkcab .tamrof tahW a !echadaeh |