Over the past few decades, news reports and other forums suggest various regulatory agencies have been faced with fending off a variety of major assault-like appearances in the context of the stock market. However, for this particular demonstration, it is the penny stock market (or PSM) that can represent how unsolicited and/or unwanted emails continues to be used to poke and prod at every fiber of our existence.
For this demonstration, the only difference between sending someone an email and sending someone a socialized comment is the receivership position of the content. Whereas email is more of a private thing, comment structures are constantly being built and/or installed into page after page after page of content as a public location available for viewing. So email=private and comment=public.
Although it may be considered outrageous to attempt to manually perform this particular type of translation, the extrapolation method is of minor relevance compared to the values being attached to scraping activities in general due to the narrow application of the concept of possessing the mechanisms to maintain a marketplace in which primarily paper is bought and sold. Complaints from time to time will pour into various regulatory agencies when a penny stock spam hits an email box, with fundamental soreness being towards unfair market manipulation, but what of the market value of a comment that just so happens to contain such derivatives? Would it make any different if the content was millions of characters long?
Dreamy as this seedier side to seeding and populating hard drives can appear to those operating with such agendas, the stretch marks being left behind by those who possess the software and the hardware being used to pursue a taught method of creating a valued backlink by posting to as many sites as possible won’t be cured by smearing cream over anything. With sideband instructions abound, it is within the promises of going unnoticed and/or undetected that add tantalizing enticement towards trying a new click habit with the hopes of eventually translating such habits into a potential income stream, thanks to that good ol’ thing called automation combined with powerful published (and private) encouragements to go ahead and give it that good ol’ college try.
The chuckle point of this particular method of translating strings into something other than the commonly expected read is most people just don’t look at their conversations as line-item derivatives of the external stock markets…
Y Exchange: NYSE Market ID: Alleghany Corporation
O Exchange: NYSE Market ID: Realty Income Corporation
U No known matches for this symbol in the NYSE
R Exchange: NYSE Market ID: Ryder System Inc.
P Exchange: NYSE Market ID: Pandora Media Inc.
H Exchange: NYSE Market ID: Hyatt Hotels Corporation
R Exchange: NYSE Market ID: Ryder System Inc.
A Exchange: NYSE Market ID: Agilent Technologies Inc.
S Exchange: NYSE Market ID: Sprint Nextel Corporation
E Exchange: NYSE Market ID: ENI S.p.A.
I No known matches for this symbol in the NYSE
S Exchange: NYSE Market ID: Sprint Nextel Corporation
M Exchange: NYSE Market ID: Macy's Inc
A Exchange: NYSE Market ID: Agilent Technologies Inc.
G Exchange: NYSE Market ID: Genpact Ltd
N Exchange: NYSE Market ID: Netsuite Inc
I No known matches for this symbol in the NYSE
F Exchange: NYSE Market ID: Ford Motor Credit Company
I No known matches for this symbol in the NYSE
C Exchange: NYSE Market ID: Citigroup Inc.
E Exchange: NYSE Market ID: ENI S.p.A.
N Exchange: NYSE Market ID: Netsuite Inc
T Exchange: NYSE Market ID: AT&T Inc.
Socialized Comment Used For Demo: Your phrase is magnificent
Total Within String: 23
Total Unique From the String: 15
Duplicates: R=2 A=2 I=3 E=2 N=2 S=2
1.09.2012
Popular Pairings 101 | 1st Demo | The Favored Fiscal Pairings
The popularity of anchoring a fiscal-related keyword primarily comes from a powerful attraction factor: money. Not just the potential money derived from advertising revenues centering around the popularity of money-related searches, but the false transference of funds using false measures and means also is a money matter.
Following is a short list of some popular fiscal pairings that are frequently found frequenting the comment sections of a social networking community. They typically are followed with some other unusual pairing of some sort, frequently hosting a link (or two or three). However, whether they are placed there to curry favor with the major search engine indexes or for some other reason is not discernable based on the presence of any of these pairings.
bad credit
bank foreclosure
bankruptcy lawyer
card credit
credit card
card payment
rental insurance
car insurance
home insurance
credit refinance
refinance home
repair credit
fix foreclosure
restoration insurance
bankruptcy credit
home refinance
insurance settlements
pre-paid debit card
Plausible Point of Purpose For Enhanced Codification
If you were to begin with a blank freedom of speech slate, there should theoretically be no penalty for using anything but a numeric system for codification purposes in the comments section of a social networking community.
For example, if I wanted to create a database that ran its index off of this list, I would use a method that assigned each of the items in the list its own data set. A spreadsheet would work fine.
So you come to this site and I offer you a search portal that invites you to search for one of the items off of the list. Depending on what I assigned to each of the items, the results put on display for your review may have zero end-user-expected relation to the item other than the fact that I originally forced the words to become related and with a little bit of additional programming, you might feel a little betrayed by what results you receive, but I never promised my content would contain relevant-only match-ups.
Keeping with the freedom of speech arguments, there still is a blank slate running here. However, with enhanced codification processes and procedures being deployed/employed with sometimes damaging commercially-driven purposes, is it even possible to draw up the architecture of the proverbial theater setting offered as a picturesque setting for when and where lines should and will be drawn when such conditions are met...?
Because there is no singular vision of what constitutes right and wrong search engine optimization architecture, there are bound to be squabbles every now and again as to who is worthy of what ranking with which search engine index, let alone how the comments come across within any social networking community.
It's when affiliate-related advertising revenues enter the equation, that's when the debates can get super down and dirty as to who is responsible for what part of detering, detecting and acting upon fiscal-fraud-related materials relative to that virtual theater no one has the master architecture plans that satisfies all fundamental freedom of speech points.
So automatically blaming an algorithm for failing to detect what content is directly associated to what affiliate network Before Comments (or BC for short) or even after comments are added is a convenient escape for unavoidable short-comings found within the art of codification itself as it relates to these types of enhanced relationships being rooted in a publisher/broadcaster having 1st round edit rights, which includes the right to speak in virtually any language, including the Storm | Rain | Beta | Because | Yet | Years | Months | Cases | Wellcome | Free formation as well as the municipal code variations.
This doesn't mean fraud doesn't exist behind the placement of these types of favorite pairings in a comments section. It just means a researcher needs a lot more evidence to go on before such intent can be revealed. It just means good luck in proving it one way or another simply because the words are on someone's poison word list.
Following is a short list of some popular fiscal pairings that are frequently found frequenting the comment sections of a social networking community. They typically are followed with some other unusual pairing of some sort, frequently hosting a link (or two or three). However, whether they are placed there to curry favor with the major search engine indexes or for some other reason is not discernable based on the presence of any of these pairings.
Begin Pop Pair 101 1st Demo
bad credit
bank foreclosure
bankruptcy lawyer
card credit
credit card
card payment
rental insurance
car insurance
home insurance
credit refinance
refinance home
repair credit
fix foreclosure
restoration insurance
bankruptcy credit
home refinance
insurance settlements
pre-paid debit card
End Popular Pairings 101 1st Demo
Plausible Point of Purpose For Enhanced Codification
If you were to begin with a blank freedom of speech slate, there should theoretically be no penalty for using anything but a numeric system for codification purposes in the comments section of a social networking community.
For example, if I wanted to create a database that ran its index off of this list, I would use a method that assigned each of the items in the list its own data set. A spreadsheet would work fine.
So you come to this site and I offer you a search portal that invites you to search for one of the items off of the list. Depending on what I assigned to each of the items, the results put on display for your review may have zero end-user-expected relation to the item other than the fact that I originally forced the words to become related and with a little bit of additional programming, you might feel a little betrayed by what results you receive, but I never promised my content would contain relevant-only match-ups.
Keeping with the freedom of speech arguments, there still is a blank slate running here. However, with enhanced codification processes and procedures being deployed/employed with sometimes damaging commercially-driven purposes, is it even possible to draw up the architecture of the proverbial theater setting offered as a picturesque setting for when and where lines should and will be drawn when such conditions are met...?
Because there is no singular vision of what constitutes right and wrong search engine optimization architecture, there are bound to be squabbles every now and again as to who is worthy of what ranking with which search engine index, let alone how the comments come across within any social networking community.
It's when affiliate-related advertising revenues enter the equation, that's when the debates can get super down and dirty as to who is responsible for what part of detering, detecting and acting upon fiscal-fraud-related materials relative to that virtual theater no one has the master architecture plans that satisfies all fundamental freedom of speech points.
So automatically blaming an algorithm for failing to detect what content is directly associated to what affiliate network Before Comments (or BC for short) or even after comments are added is a convenient escape for unavoidable short-comings found within the art of codification itself as it relates to these types of enhanced relationships being rooted in a publisher/broadcaster having 1st round edit rights, which includes the right to speak in virtually any language, including the Storm | Rain | Beta | Because | Yet | Years | Months | Cases | Wellcome | Free formation as well as the municipal code variations.
This doesn't mean fraud doesn't exist behind the placement of these types of favorite pairings in a comments section. It just means a researcher needs a lot more evidence to go on before such intent can be revealed. It just means good luck in proving it one way or another simply because the words are on someone's poison word list.
1.08.2012
Build A Comment 101 | 1st Demo | The Common Short Comment
The following comment formation permits two points of option for someone to choose from in a short chain of words. The option feature of this demo is disabled and the word lists contained herewithin can be found expounded upon within a variety of social networking communities. A Punctuation Placement Addendum can be found after the end of the demo.
This
was
Punctuation Placement Addendum #1
Placement of punctuation has a special place within the pulse of the comment community.
For example, does one use two spaces to leave behind a symbolic smiley face? What if you were limited to less than 100 characters? 50 characters? 5,000? Would these numbers change your initial choice to use something other than the more traditional alphabets present across the world to deliver a message to someone?
Another example, how many question marks does it take for a question to be viewed seriously? Quizzically? Confusingly? Would a question mark and exclamation point combo carry the message properly? Improperly? Would too many mean one has gone overboard? Over the top? Outrageously?
Using content from the lists above, here's a short punctuation variation demonstration at the end of the comment. How much does the punctuation influence your interpretation of the comment, if at all?
This article was useful?
This discussion was long! :(
This content was amusing. :>)
This post was motivating... ;>)
This file was long!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This location was interesting?!?!?!?!
Puncture-Proof Punctuation Puffing is a freedom of speech tolerance that holds significant social implications when used in a social commenting setting. However, since the use and application of punctuation to enhance and/or augment a text-only comment comes with a variety of pay-offs and penalties only the author of such an effect can weight for themselves.
Positive and negative reactions can creep up on a consumer of text at any moment, especially when it comes to punctuation. Punctuation takes up space on hard drives and fills the airwaves. Pick your punctuation with purpose but please try not to use your punctuation to purposely flood a social setting with distractions.
Begin BAC 101 1st Demo
This
was
End BAC 101 1st Demo
Placement of punctuation has a special place within the pulse of the comment community.
For example, does one use two spaces to leave behind a symbolic smiley face? What if you were limited to less than 100 characters? 50 characters? 5,000? Would these numbers change your initial choice to use something other than the more traditional alphabets present across the world to deliver a message to someone?
Another example, how many question marks does it take for a question to be viewed seriously? Quizzically? Confusingly? Would a question mark and exclamation point combo carry the message properly? Improperly? Would too many mean one has gone overboard? Over the top? Outrageously?
Using content from the lists above, here's a short punctuation variation demonstration at the end of the comment. How much does the punctuation influence your interpretation of the comment, if at all?
This article was useful?
This discussion was long! :(
This content was amusing. :>)
This post was motivating... ;>)
This file was long!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This location was interesting?!?!?!?!
Puncture-Proof Punctuation Puffing is a freedom of speech tolerance that holds significant social implications when used in a social commenting setting. However, since the use and application of punctuation to enhance and/or augment a text-only comment comes with a variety of pay-offs and penalties only the author of such an effect can weight for themselves.
Positive and negative reactions can creep up on a consumer of text at any moment, especially when it comes to punctuation. Punctuation takes up space on hard drives and fills the airwaves. Pick your punctuation with purpose but please try not to use your punctuation to purposely flood a social setting with distractions.
Taking a Quick Crack at the "Hello world" Comment
With dating lines able to grow stale within a matter of a moments, the competition to portray a sense of friendliness and perhaps even playfulness might be exponentially growing, but there still are comments that are just so old and dry, such as the "Hello, world" comment, it is nothing but a marvel such phrasing is still being offered up with such speed of conviction in this day and age of string derivative buying, selling and trading.
I realize there will be disagreement with the short list I am offering as my opening post, but its a list of possibilities only. That doesn't mean there isn't room for many more reasons and purposes to broadcast the comment. It just means I decided to keep the list short.
5 possible reasons someone is broadcasting the social comment "Hello world!"
1. You believe the entire world world will undoubtedly race to consume your content and you're just trying to follow theoretical international protocols and procedures for being courteous and friendly to one and all.
2. You opened a new blog with an unnamed service provider and your default post already says "Hello, world!" and you leave it there because you think it looks "cute".
3. You have a vested interest in the current market value of the string and need to apply it somewhere in the indexes to help direct dollars and cents your way.
4. Your first name is Hello and your last name is World
5. Your first name is World and your last name is Hello
I realize there will be disagreement with the short list I am offering as my opening post, but its a list of possibilities only. That doesn't mean there isn't room for many more reasons and purposes to broadcast the comment. It just means I decided to keep the list short.
5 possible reasons someone is broadcasting the social comment "Hello world!"
1. You believe the entire world world will undoubtedly race to consume your content and you're just trying to follow theoretical international protocols and procedures for being courteous and friendly to one and all.
2. You opened a new blog with an unnamed service provider and your default post already says "Hello, world!" and you leave it there because you think it looks "cute".
3. You have a vested interest in the current market value of the string and need to apply it somewhere in the indexes to help direct dollars and cents your way.
4. Your first name is Hello and your last name is World
5. Your first name is World and your last name is Hello
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)