Following is a short list of some popular fiscal pairings that are frequently found frequenting the comment sections of a social networking community. They typically are followed with some other unusual pairing of some sort, frequently hosting a link (or two or three). However, whether they are placed there to curry favor with the major search engine indexes or for some other reason is not discernable based on the presence of any of these pairings.
Begin Pop Pair 101 1st Demo
bad credit
bank foreclosure
bankruptcy lawyer
card credit
credit card
card payment
rental insurance
car insurance
home insurance
credit refinance
refinance home
repair credit
fix foreclosure
restoration insurance
bankruptcy credit
home refinance
insurance settlements
pre-paid debit card
End Popular Pairings 101 1st Demo
Plausible Point of Purpose For Enhanced Codification
If you were to begin with a blank freedom of speech slate, there should theoretically be no penalty for using anything but a numeric system for codification purposes in the comments section of a social networking community.
For example, if I wanted to create a database that ran its index off of this list, I would use a method that assigned each of the items in the list its own data set. A spreadsheet would work fine.
So you come to this site and I offer you a search portal that invites you to search for one of the items off of the list. Depending on what I assigned to each of the items, the results put on display for your review may have zero end-user-expected relation to the item other than the fact that I originally forced the words to become related and with a little bit of additional programming, you might feel a little betrayed by what results you receive, but I never promised my content would contain relevant-only match-ups.
Keeping with the freedom of speech arguments, there still is a blank slate running here. However, with enhanced codification processes and procedures being deployed/employed with sometimes damaging commercially-driven purposes, is it even possible to draw up the architecture of the proverbial theater setting offered as a picturesque setting for when and where lines should and will be drawn when such conditions are met...?
Because there is no singular vision of what constitutes right and wrong search engine optimization architecture, there are bound to be squabbles every now and again as to who is worthy of what ranking with which search engine index, let alone how the comments come across within any social networking community.
It's when affiliate-related advertising revenues enter the equation, that's when the debates can get super down and dirty as to who is responsible for what part of detering, detecting and acting upon fiscal-fraud-related materials relative to that virtual theater no one has the master architecture plans that satisfies all fundamental freedom of speech points.
So automatically blaming an algorithm for failing to detect what content is directly associated to what affiliate network Before Comments (or BC for short) or even after comments are added is a convenient escape for unavoidable short-comings found within the art of codification itself as it relates to these types of enhanced relationships being rooted in a publisher/broadcaster having 1st round edit rights, which includes the right to speak in virtually any language, including the Storm | Rain | Beta | Because | Yet | Years | Months | Cases | Wellcome | Free formation as well as the municipal code variations.
This doesn't mean fraud doesn't exist behind the placement of these types of favorite pairings in a comments section. It just means a researcher needs a lot more evidence to go on before such intent can be revealed. It just means good luck in proving it one way or another simply because the words are on someone's poison word list.